Here is the Playback: http://www.flightradar24.com/2014-03...MAS370/2d81a27
Above is the playback of the ADS-B signal received by a company called flightradar24, a company that has put the location of all aircraft with an ADS-B transponder on the internet for everyone to see.
More insight from the flight radar forum:
What about military submarines? Wouldn't there be Chinese + US submarines (at least? - also Indian, Russian?) in the Indian Ocean with sophisticated equipment on 24/7 and able to catch the noise of a plunging aircraft? Assuming that they shared info on such noise wouldn't they be able to triangulate a crash location (if indeed this is what happened)?
IF the following info I gather from the internet is accurate:
1) Australia's OTH radar coverage
JORS_640px.png
2) The "official" OTH radar range is 3000 km (i.e. unofficially could be farther)
3) Current area of south Indian Ocean search
mh370_australia_search_2103_840_441_100.jpg
Then wouldn't/couldn't this translate to Australia actually detected MH370 on the day it vanished (at their outermost OTH radar envelop), hence their focus on searching this area from the start?
But it doesn't make sense that AUS would with-hold this kind of info?!?!
Just wondering....
I am reading that sound can travel far without loosing much energy along specific depth channels so I am hoping that it would be similar along the water surface (i'm not an acoustic engineer)....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/satellite-locates-malaysian-flight-370-still-flying-seven-hours-after-takeoff/2014/03/15/96627a24-ac86-11e3-a06a-e3230a43d6cb_graphic.html
More insight from the flight radar forum:
What about military submarines? Wouldn't there be Chinese + US submarines (at least? - also Indian, Russian?) in the Indian Ocean with sophisticated equipment on 24/7 and able to catch the noise of a plunging aircraft? Assuming that they shared info on such noise wouldn't they be able to triangulate a crash location (if indeed this is what happened)?
IF the following info I gather from the internet is accurate:
1) Australia's OTH radar coverage
JORS_640px.png
2) The "official" OTH radar range is 3000 km (i.e. unofficially could be farther)
3) Current area of south Indian Ocean search
mh370_australia_search_2103_840_441_100.jpg
Then wouldn't/couldn't this translate to Australia actually detected MH370 on the day it vanished (at their outermost OTH radar envelop), hence their focus on searching this area from the start?
But it doesn't make sense that AUS would with-hold this kind of info?!?!
Just wondering....
I am reading that sound can travel far without loosing much energy along specific depth channels so I am hoping that it would be similar along the water surface (i'm not an acoustic engineer)....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/satellite-locates-malaysian-flight-370-still-flying-seven-hours-after-takeoff/2014/03/15/96627a24-ac86-11e3-a06a-e3230a43d6cb_graphic.html
